What is Hegel's critique of Kant in Reason as Testing Laws Is Hegel Essay

What is Hegels critique of Kant in Reason as Testing Laws Is Hegel fair to Kant - Essay pillowcaseFor Kant the matte imperative is important mainly because it determines the will independently of the sensuous motives of which ordinary moral deliberation is suspect.2 Therefore for him there is a pronounced difference between acting honestly for ones own sake and acting honestly with the belief that truth is a universal requirement the latter of which relates to categorical imperative.3For Kant duty requires more than the universal form of action and he brings out these ideas and notions of the categorical imperative which Kant claims are merely so many formulations of precisely the resembling law.Also for him the categorical imperative contains an end which functions as the single limiting condition of moral action. 4Thus in his book the Formula of the End, Kant says proceed in such(prenominal) a way that you always care humanity, whether in your own person or in the person of any other, never scarce as a means, but always at the same time as an endKant goes on to clarify further that if humans are to be treated as ends in themselves then each individual should be allowed to choose their own ends at the same time. Furthermore he claims that misleading somebody (by lying to them) for a particular Design is the way of using that other person as means rather than an end. Therefore the assertion not to treat humanity as a means but an end, i.e. when they choose to help you themselves.Hegels objurgation of KantHegel has made some interesting criticisms of the emptiness that seems to surround the Categorical crying when he says that The criterion of law which Reason possesses within itself, fits every case equally well, and is thus in fact no criterion at all.5 However in the... What is Hegels critique of Kant in Reason as Testing Laws Is Hegel fair to Kant?For Hegel this idea is fruitless in many respects as he thinks that even immoral behaviour would qualify under the test given by Kant and that there no formulation of a universal set of duties .Thus Hegels criticism of Kant largely concerns Kants so called formalism as has been discussed by Julian. Before discussing Hegels critique of Kant it would be useful to explain the ideas of Kant who expresses interest in the relationship between basis and experience. For Kant knowledge begins with experience in a rather chronological sense.For Kant empirical knowledge should be a compound of that which we receive through impressions and that which our faculty of cognition supplies from itself. And that reason should become the tool that isolates knowledge from everything empirical from it.Julian has pointed out that Hegel believes that Kants idea of a duty does not produce an immanent angle of inclination of duties. To be fair this is not one of Kants objectives at all and it can be safely said that Hegel is missing the point of Kants claim, because devising such a list is not possible at all due to peoples differing notions of what morality or duties should be identical.In this regard I would like to give the example of local conventions in certain areas. The notion of hospitality in Asian countries allows anyone to be welcome in anothers syndicate and there is hardly any concept of unauthorized entrance as in the case of western countries.